Deals with our daily life activities and new updates
Tuesday, 26 April 2016
Friday, 19 February 2016
SAPNE
SAPNE
Aaye the is duniya me khali kitaab lekr,
pata na tha jana kaha thikana kaha,
abhi in kadamon ne chlna bhi na seekha tha,
duniya ne kaha tera thikana yahaan,
chlne lge us raste pe jisne kaha jana yahaan,
kuch door pahuche to zindagi ne kaha thm ja yahaan,
dekha doaudti hui bheed ko or lg ja iske peeche,
chlne lge hm bhi wahaan tum bhi wahaan,
bs pata nhi tha jana kahaan..
Is khali kitaab me likhna kya tha na pucha kisi ne,
meri kitaab ka lekhak kaun hoga na socha kisi ne,
sapno ko apne jeb me dabaye chl diye hm is duniya k ppeeche,
kiske aage hai ya kiske peecha na socha kisi ne,
Samundra ki lehron ko bhi hai kinara milta,
kya is daaud se hme bhi chutkara milta?
mann me the aise kuch sawal jiska uttar na tha,
bs chlte chlte kinara ko pana tha,
paraye spno ko sch kr dikahana tha...
kyun maine apne sapno ki awaazz ko na suna,
aaj dil me dard hai kahi isme khushi ka thikanaa hota,
na sch kr pate yadi in spno ko bhi,
inhe pani khushi ka yaraaana hota,
abhi kuch bigda nhi,
uthao kadam apne spno ki or....
ki kadam bhi kahe ki tjhe jana wahaan,
chlne lge hm bhi waha tum bhi waha...
bs pata nhi tha jana kaha...

Wednesday, 17 February 2016
JNU row: Questions to be answeredhttp://blogs.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/randomaccess/jnu-row-some-questions-we-all-need-to-ask/
Anti-national slogans by students at Delhi’s Jawaharlal Nehru University — and it seems to be spreading as it has now happened in Jadavpur University — have made India’s already massive political divide more pronounced than ever before. This divide is almost scary for those interested in the nation’s growth, even as those who want this nation to not develop are rubbing their hands in glee.
1. Should students be shouting anti-national slogans on college campuses?
No. Whatever the argument, the answer is NO and that is in CAPS "NO".
2. Does it mean that the entire campus is tainted and every college student should be branded anti-national because of these students?
No.
3. Is there a design behind this anti-national rant turning into a contagion across university campuses?
Perhaps.
4. Who could be behind it?
Whoever it is, he cannot be a friend of India.
5. Should we criticize those who indulge in anti-national sloganeering in an academic institution?
Yes.
6. Should we defend those who openly say they want to divide India, destroy India?
Never.
7. When we used to respond so strongly to such statements being made in Kashmir, how can we accept it when it is made in our nation’s capital?
Point.
8. What do you call those who are justifying this anti-national sloganeering as ‘freedom of expression’?
Opportunists, misguided, using the event to cover their nefarious activities, misleading commoners into believing that all this is harmless when it isn’t.
9. Would they use the phrase — freedom of expression— when VHP’s Pravin Togadia or Akbaruddin Owaisi spew venom?
NEVER, because it doesn’t suit them then. In any case, hate speech, slogans etc., are made to divide society and the reaction/response to them each and every time has to be an unequivocal NO.
10. What about politicians who have, covertly or overtly, come out in support of anti-national sloganeers?
Worse than opportunists. If a wrong is done, stand up against it, but don’t, for God’s sake, make statements that bolster anti-India elements. When you do so, you are worse than the young, sloganeering students.
11. What happens when the opposition targets the government, and more importantly, the institutions, for anything and everything?
If you have proof of wrongdoing, please criticize. Indeed, smother them. In fact, if there is proof, inaction on the part of authorities too should be criticized in the strongest possible terms. But if there’s no proof, then shut up. It harms the institution’s reputation. It hurts those who are good and work for the good of the nation. It destroys the credibility of the institution that is critical for the nation. If politicians need to settle scores, they would do well to spare the institutions, for the nation’s good.
12. There are reports that on some university campuses in India, students celebrate when Pakistan beats India in a sporting event. If so, how should we react?
I will feel sad, but, in a way, wouldn’t the British feel the same when Britons of Indian-origin celebrate an Indian win over their adopted country? We call them traitors here, but I would perhaps wink and look the other way.
13. If there are reports that students celebrate and make anti-India speeches when Indian soldiers are killed in border firing, or para-military soldiers are killed by Maoists in the Naxal belt, how would I react?
With absolute shock and anger. I would want authorities to take action against such students/individuals.
14. How would you react to the violence when the JNU student was being presented to the court?
Abhorring.
15. What should be done to the lawyers and others who thrashed journalists covering the event at courts yesterday?
Punish them. Since there is a video clip available too of some of them, give them exemplary punishment. Let none think they are above law.
16. Have journalists always been fair in their assessment of issues and events or have they been parochial?
Like in any profession, there are some who are objective and some who are not. But generally, the media has been fair.
17. Has the government handled the situation well?
Perhaps, but it lacks the tact needed to not allow things to be misused by others. Perception management is a critical element of governance and that is something the government needs to work on.
18. Given the acrimonious stance adopted by political parties, the budget session of parliament that is to begin soon may again be a wasted one. It will mean a lot of legislative business would again go unattended. How would you term this?
This, in my mind is also anti-national activity. Allow bills to be passed. When this continues session after session, in the era of social media, politicians are eroding the credibility of the institution called Parliament.
As I said before the first question, please add your bits as comments. Let this debate continue. Let the country and its politicians know what the people want and let us hold them responsible. Let them know that this is our country and if you won’t act responsibly, we would not let you ruin it for us.
Jai Hind!
No.
Perhaps.
Whoever it is, he cannot be a friend of India.
Yes.
Never.
Point.
Opportunists, misguided, using the event to cover their nefarious activities, misleading commoners into believing that all this is harmless when it isn’t.
NEVER, because it doesn’t suit them then. In any case, hate speech, slogans etc., are made to divide society and the reaction/response to them each and every time has to be an unequivocal NO.
Worse than opportunists. If a wrong is done, stand up against it, but don’t, for God’s sake, make statements that bolster anti-India elements. When you do so, you are worse than the young, sloganeering students.
If you have proof of wrongdoing, please criticize. Indeed, smother them. In fact, if there is proof, inaction on the part of authorities too should be criticized in the strongest possible terms. But if there’s no proof, then shut up. It harms the institution’s reputation. It hurts those who are good and work for the good of the nation. It destroys the credibility of the institution that is critical for the nation. If politicians need to settle scores, they would do well to spare the institutions, for the nation’s good.
I will feel sad, but, in a way, wouldn’t the British feel the same when Britons of Indian-origin celebrate an Indian win over their adopted country? We call them traitors here, but I would perhaps wink and look the other way.
With absolute shock and anger. I would want authorities to take action against such students/individuals.
Abhorring.
Punish them. Since there is a video clip available too of some of them, give them exemplary punishment. Let none think they are above law.
Like in any profession, there are some who are objective and some who are not. But generally, the media has been fair.
Perhaps, but it lacks the tact needed to not allow things to be misused by others. Perception management is a critical element of governance and that is something the government needs to work on.
This, in my mind is also anti-national activity. Allow bills to be passed. When this continues session after session, in the era of social media, politicians are eroding the credibility of the institution called Parliament.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Featured post
Power Of Compounding
Compounding investment earnings can turn your small investments into a whopping sum after a period of time. The best way to take advantage...
-
As Prime Minister Narendra Modi's first meeting with US president Donald Trump inches closer, the US is expected to approve India...
-
Do you ever feel there’s a greater being inside of you just bursting to get out? You can feel its presence sometimes, can’t you? It’s th...
-
Here are the steps to begin investing in the stock market: Research about the market Before investing your money on random stocks that ...